Monday, November 28, 2011

Thinking Outside the Box

Plato’s “Allegory of the Caves” and Sartre’s, “No Exit” both show the limitations of human thinking, which is slavery, but also provide solutions. The limitation of “Allegory of the Caves” is that humans have a distorted reality, and they will remain that way unless they are enlightened by philosophy. The limitation in “No Exit” is that people lack confidence to accept the inalienable freedom of defining themselves. The solution implied by Sartre is for people to stop seeking validation from other people, because it will give them peace and freedom from enslavement of other peoples beliefs. Plato and Sartre are similar because they both presented the limitations of our thinking with an allegory, they also presented the solution with a story, and they seem to have hope for humans because they imply ways to escape the chains of mental enslavement.
Both philosophers present the problem of freedom vs. slavery in their stories. Plato’s issue is that the cave slaves have a distorted view of reality, because they know nothing of the world except the wall they are chained to and the shadows that they can see. They are a slave to ignorance. A character is released from the cave and shown a larger slice of the world. He is now free from chains he never knew enslaved him. Because he has seen “the light”, he can never return to the old life he knew.
In comparison, Sartre also presents the issue of freedom vs. slavery on a level that surpasses physical chains. The three main characters in his story are also chained. They were in Hell before death, as well as after death. The source of their discord and discomfort came from the habit of looking to other people to validate themselves. Garcin, the journalist from Rio, struggled most with this because he could not have peace until other people believed he was innocent. He believed that he could never feel mentally free from crime unless other people believed his innocence. This is an issue within himself, not a chemical or physical change that can take place. The two other characters are also chained to the emotional cinder block of finding self-worth and satisfaction from other people.
To conclude, Plato and Sartre’s stories both aim to target the issue of mental enslavement. They try to share their enlightenment with the audience by showing them how silly it is to be enslaved by beliefs and other people. When your happiness or peace-of-mind is determined by other people, you automatically allow yourself to become enslaved by them, hence “No Exit”.

3 comments:

  1. I thought that was very interesting how you compared the two works with enslavement. I didn't even make that connecting, but the way how you explained it, I can see how they are trying to portray that. I also agree that the two pieces were trying to show how the characters had no freedom. I felt the Allegory cave had a more sense of it being about enslavement then the "No Exit." They also had there freedom taken away but it was their fault they were in that situation. While the cave prisoners where forced there. Nice job thinking outside the box. (no pun intended)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Stephanie. You took a different turn in writing your essay, but it's very still well organized and thought out! You mentioned things I hadn't even made connections with or thought about including. For instance, the way you explained the comparison of the two, I understood but reading it, it made me think a bit differently in a way I haven't realized or really thought about it yet ha

    ReplyDelete
  3. hahaha Stephanie, "No pun intended"
    Thank you girls very much, I really tried to take a different approach to it. I tend to connect many stories and ideals back to the idea of "freedom vs. enslavement" considering anything can enslave someone, whether it be a fear, idea, or even chains; but at the same time, many things can free a person. Liberty is a very important thing to me!

    ReplyDelete